Prediction of Jannik Sinner [1st] vs Mackenzie Mcdonald [100th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead To Head: Sinner 4 - 0 Mcdonald
They have played 13 sets in total, with Sinner winning 10 and Mcdonald winning 3. The last match between Sinner and Mcdonald was at the U.S. Open - New York, 27-08-2024, First, Hard with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 2-6 6-2 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | 4 |
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 0 |
| Sinner | Stats | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| 100% (7-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (16-10) |
| 4 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 1 | Ranking | 100 |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 23 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 6 |
| 74% (355-124) | Career Total W/L | 56% (329-257) |
| $26,114,030 | Career Prize Money | $3,287,250 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
109
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
19 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
74%
(
97 of
131)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
59 of
97)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
35 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
126
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
| 7-5 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
50%
(
54 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
79 of
125)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
118
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 10 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 76 | Games Won | 52 |
| 28 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:35:58 | Average Match Time | 2:35:58 |
| 55% (214/390) | 1st Serve % | 66% (293/444) |
| 77% (164/214) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (180/293) |
| 55% (97/176) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (74/151) |
| 36% (20/56) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (10/31) |
| 43% (190/444) | Return Points Win % | 33% (129/390) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jannik Sinner vs Mackenzie Mcdonald Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sinner 4 - 0 Mcdonald
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sinner has won 42.19% of points on their second serve, while Mcdonald has won 46.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sinner, in recent form, has won 37.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mcdonald has won 45.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.6% and 26.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sinner has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mcdonald has saved 49.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sinner has won 93.22% of matches played (W/L 55/ 4), with Mcdonald winning 58.33% (W/L 42/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sinner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 80% (W/L 100/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43). Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 215/ 151), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 23/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Sinner has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 92% of matches (W/L 23/ 2), where as Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Sinner winning 4 times and Mcdonald being victorious 0 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Sinner winning 10 and Mcdonald winning 3. The last match between Sinner and Mcdonald was at the U.S. Open - New York, 27-08-2024, First, Hard with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 2-6 6-2 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sinner and Mcdonald have played a deciding set 2 times, with Sinner winning 2 times and Mcdonald 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sinner winning 1, and Mcdonald 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sinner has played against opponents with an average rank of 41.2 while Mcdonald has played against players with an average rank of 202.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sinner has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mcdonald has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sinner has converted 23.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mcdonald has converted 27.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jannik Sinner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alexander Zverev
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
23 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Ben Shelton
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
118)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alex De Minaur
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
29 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
120
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Marcos Giron
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
83 of
138)
14
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
10
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
59 of
83)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
31 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
60 of
138)
129
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Nicolas Jarry
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
23 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
111
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alex De Minaur
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Pavel Kotov
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
10
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Sinner vs Mcdonald?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Sinner Vs Mcdonald is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74% (355/124) | Win/Loss | 56% (329/257) |
| 69% (847/383) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (790/636) |
| 56% (6615/5160) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7081/6554) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2498 | Aces Total | 2374 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1003 | Total Double Faults | 1330 |
| 1:49:14 | Average Match Time | 1:33:6 |
| 245.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.64 |
| 59% (20460/34614) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25227/39907) |
| 74% (15159/20460) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17586/25227) |
| 54% (7658/14154) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7523/14680) |
| 43% (1567/3656) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1607/3806) |
| 41% (14819/36364) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15816/40648) |
| 73% (280/382) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (305/536) |
| 78% (72/92) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 63% (115/184) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (95/189) |
| 63% (90/144) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (82/178) |
| 89% (341/304) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (342/275) |
| 11% (341/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (342/67) |
| 37% (138/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (244/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
